by South Charleston, Ohio — An elderly Ohio man who shot and killed an Uber driver outside his home after mistakenly believing she was part of a scam has been sentenced to 21 years to life in prison, bringing a tragic and emotionally charged case to a close.
William J. Brock, 83, was sentenced Monday after a jury found him guilty of murder in the fatal shooting of Lo-Letha Toland-Hall, a 61-year-old Uber driver who had unknowingly been sent to his home as part of an elaborate phone scam.
Scam phone call set deadly chain of events in motion
According to trial testimony, Brock had been on the phone with scammers who falsely claimed that a close relative had been arrested and urgently needed bail money. The caller instructed Brock to withdraw $12,000 and warned him that failure to comply would result in serious consequences.
When Brock began to realize the story was untrue, the caller allegedly became aggressive and threatening.
Investigators said the scammer then instructed Brock to hand over the money to someone who would arrive at his home — a moment that tragically coincided with Toland-Hall’s arrival.
Uber driver was also a victim of the same scam
Prosecutors said Toland-Hall had no connection to the scammers and was completely unaware of the situation unfolding at Brock’s home. She had been dispatched through Uber to pick up what she believed was a routine package.
Authorities later confirmed that Toland-Hall herself had been manipulated by the scam operation, making her an unknowing participant in the scheme that ultimately led to her death.
Confrontation escalated into fatal shooting
When Toland-Hall arrived at Brock’s residence, prosecutors said Brock confronted her with a firearm, believing she was part of the plot to steal his money. During the confrontation, Toland-Hall reportedly tried to explain that she was an Uber driver and pleaded with Brock not to shoot.
Despite those pleas, Brock fired six gunshots, striking Toland-Hall. She was rushed to a nearby hospital, where she later died from her injuries.
Prosecutors emphasized that Toland-Hall was unarmed and posed no physical threat.
Jury rejects self-defense claim
During the trial, Brock’s defense argued that he acted in self-defense, citing fear and confusion caused by the scammer’s threats. The jury, however, rejected that argument after reviewing surveillance footage, witness testimony, and forensic evidence.
The verdict concluded that Brock’s actions were not legally justified, despite the stressful circumstances surrounding the scam.
Court imposes lengthy sentence
On Monday, the court sentenced Brock to 21 years to life, reflecting both the severity of the crime and Ohio’s sentencing guidelines for murder convictions.
The sentence means Brock will be eligible for parole only after serving the minimum term, with any release dependent on future parole board decisions.
Prosecutor calls case deeply tragic
Clark County Prosecutor Daniel Driscoll described the case as heartbreaking for everyone involved, noting that multiple families were devastated by the outcome.
“Both families have lost loved ones because of this, and there are no winners here,” Driscoll said following the verdict.
He also stressed that the individuals who orchestrated the scam — the root cause of the tragedy — remain at large.
“The really sad part about this is that the scammers who started this haven’t been brought to justice,” Driscoll said. “We hope federal authorities will one day hold them accountable for the harm they caused.”
Scammers remain unidentified
Despite extensive investigation, authorities have not yet identified or arrested the scammers responsible for manipulating both Brock and Toland-Hall. Federal investigators continue to pursue leads related to the phone scam operation.
Law enforcement officials warn that phone scams targeting older adults are becoming increasingly sophisticated and dangerous, often using fear tactics to provoke impulsive decisions.
Read Also: Alabama Man Charged in Teen Cheerleader’s Killing Released on $330K Bond
Community reflects on preventable loss
Friends and family members of Toland-Hall remembered her as a hardworking, kind woman who was simply doing her job when her life was cut short. The case has sparked renewed conversations about firearm safety, scam awareness, and protections for gig-economy workers.
While the sentence brings legal closure, many involved acknowledge that it cannot undo the harm caused.
Should stronger safeguards exist to protect both seniors and gig workers from scam-driven violence? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
